Archive for November, 2010

The truth about energy and environmental protection

Posted by admin on November 16, 2010
Netbook / Comments Off

Mark Twain had a famous saying “Most people in trouble is not their ignorance, but that they know so much not the case in the thing.” Today’s advanced information technology, energy and environmental topics almost every day to attract our attention, and even stimulate our nerves, everyone can say a few words on this, take the political is the right attitude. But really is that true? I am afraid many may not be so different.

Science squirrel popular science books I would recommend all to buy, you can say that books are great, where “the future president of the physics class” is a classic writer is professor of physics at the University of California at Berkeley, Dr. Mueller, who was awarded the MacArthur Award ( commonly known as the “genius award”), is the U.S. government’s chief adviser. I quoted the text view and the data mainly come from the book, but the data converted into what we used to say.

Why do we like gasoline and coal? The reason is simple, the weight of energy in the same comparison, the maximum energy released gasoline, which is 2 times of coal, methanol, 2 times, 1.4 times of ethanol, butanol (possible future fuel) of 1.1 times, TNT’s 15 times, the best battery (laptop battery) 100 times, 1000 times flashlight batteries. And, with the wind, solar compared to gasoline too cheap.

The coal is the cheapest source of energy, the energy of a ton of coal equivalent to 900 liters of gasoline, the cost of a ton of coal a few hundred dollars, and 900 liters of gasoline have to 5000, coal much cheaper than gasoline.

China can not afford the wind, solar, can only afford to use coal and oil, and China has a lot of coal, over the centuries are used up. Of course, coal energy than all the other damage to the environment are large, the same energy than oil and gas under the more carbon dioxide, but for China, coal power generation is currently no way to do.

Wind and solar energy is clean energy, why not use a large scale, mainly due to the high price of wind power and solar energy, low efficiency, without considering the cost of collecting wind energy equipment, operating costs alone for much more than oil and coal, This is not not want to use, but could not afford, established for political purposes throughout the wind power plants are basically making a loss shouted. In order to pass the cost of some local governments to force businesses to use a certain percentage of wind energy for, and pay higher costs.

Solar power on the ground is about 1,000 watts per square meter, this does not seem small, but the conversion efficiency of solar panels, only 15%, 41% laboratory efficiency of the battery, the price per square meter, up to $ 100,000 . Bath using solar energy can also be burning point, but far enough to drive cars, and covering the solar cells on the roof, even if 100% conversion efficiency (of course this is impossible), it would only provide a horsepower power. So, even if in the future, nor can there be solar car. The existence of solar-powered aircraft, such as “Pathfinder” No, the solar cell maximum power of 17 horsepower, load 45 kg and a wingspan of 75 meters, the speed of 30 km per hour to fly slowly.

There is also a way of using solar energy, is to use mirrors or lenses focus sunlight and water vapor to drive a steam engine burned out, Spain and got such a solar power plant, but the cost is 3 times the coal, mainly by the Royal support, at least in the does not promote the current value.

The most fatal problem electric vehicle batteries stored energy is compared with a small gasoline too much, even with the current best laptop computer batteries, the same weight, the energy of the battery is only 1% of gasoline, gasoline cars can fill up 500 km run, even if the battery light and low car made more smooth, running 50 kilometers, but also Xiecai had, and once again charge a lot more time than refueling time, and the battery charge a few hundred times after the waste , and another big tank you to death a new battery.

Electric vehicle market speculation has already begun, and its gimmick is the economic and environmental protection, in fact, these two statements are not scientific, first, in the current technical conditions, it is more expensive than petrol vehicles, if high enough, then government subsidies’d can be considered, but the high subsidies of consumer goods is not fair to taxpayers; Second, the battery is not a source of energy, but only an energy storage carrier, the electric charge to the inside or from the traditional coal, etc. , taking into account the conversion efficiency can not reach 100%, their emissions of greenhouse gases will be higher, though not ranked on the road Bale.

As nuclear power reactors can not explode like an atomic bomb, this is the consensus of the world of physical scientists, nuclear potential danger is that the container is broken, the release of radioactive gases and volatile elements like iodine. Chernobyl nuclear reactor explosion is not a nuclear bomb, the explosion is similar to ordinary explosives, due to design errors, not even a building surrounded by the container are not, if there is an accident is likely a person will not die. In the pebble bed reactor design, temperature of the graphite in place of uranium, even if the failure to reach the maximum temperature of the reactor, which is solid and reliable container material.

Controlled nuclear fusion is the future of nuclear energy, which is to provide energy for the reaction of the sun, this is the current research focus is to solve the energy problems of human hope, but scientists estimate that within the last two decades, I am afraid, can not become a reality .

Jianghai sun lakes, rising water vapor to form clouds, rain and snow to the mountains the next, and then down stream, the water we stopped building dams, power generation using potential difference, which is water. Hydropower does not produce any greenhouse gases and other pollution, and even unlike wind and solar power as possible to use a lot of pollution, heavy metals and chemicals, can be called the most green, the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy, but also of its power generation is quite large. The cost of water is about 8,000 yuan / kW, water is the cheapest electricity, water and electricity are higher the proportion of the world’s countries, the cheaper the price.

However, it is entangled, it has become the environmentalists (we call pseudo-environmentalists) the most hated of energy. Some time ago, a senior water researcher scientists Zhang Boting (net water blog), a pseudo-environmental reporter refute the argument. Understood by the reporter level of hydropower development terms, the degree of development of hydropower is only twenty percent more, Sichuan, Yunnan, only ten percent level of hydropower development, but added, “However, China Most of the rivers of water resources development by up to 80%, Sichuan and Yunnan in Southwest China’s water resources development and level of some rivers and even up to 100%. ” Because the number of fabricated data and the logic of chaos, Zhang researchers called shameless ignorance, the result was the reporter to violate defamation lawsuit on the grounds.

Indeed, part of the dam will affect the construction of ecological environment construction will conduct a comprehensive evaluation before, and gives detailed analysis of the EIA report. The Nu River dam, for example, each designer hired by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tsinghua University and other units of the dams on debris, sand, plants, fish, landscape effects were demonstrated. Some pseudo-environmentalists to water damage to the environment as the culprit, which is very worthy of our attention.

Environmental protection is undoubtedly important, but its essence is a matter of science, scientific conclusions should act as the basis for environmental protection, can not rely on faith and fanaticism to do things. Based on existing technology status and China’s national conditions, the state vigorously develop hydropower, and gradually expand the proportion of water policy is reasonable. Moreover, the largest coal carbon emissions will continue for a long period of time, no need to pseudo-environmentalists with the wind and wild accusations.

Technical Analysis on Supercapacitor

Posted by admin on November 15, 2010
Netbook / Comments Off

In any case call, super-capacitor (ultracapacitor) or super capacitor (supercapacitor) these new capacitors than traditional capacitor is much greater. Directly, you can now buy rating for the 5 ~ 10F/2.5V onboard the radial lead type capacitors, rated at 120 ~ 150F/5V flash cell size of the capacitor, the greater the single capacitor can reach 650 ~ 3000F/2.7V capacitance. Note that all of these capacitor values are in units of farads. In the long ago, two thousand microfarads device is considered to be a big capacitor.

If you need more types of capacitors, you can order a capacitor rated at 20F to 500F, 15V to 390V voltage rating for the stock of various capacitors. If the use of appropriate series / parallel combination, you can even drive a bus with these capacitors (bus) – Yes, not the circuit board wiring, but the passenger bus vehicles. (Although the mixed fuel systems, chemical batteries and fuel cells just around the corner, but they are slow to put into use.)

Super capacitor in the R & D, people did not find any new laws of physics. In fact, the principle of super-capacitors are still going back to the German physicist Helmholtz. Like ordinary capacitors, super capacitor is used in the two “plates” in the form of stored charge between the stored energy. The size of capacitor plate area and between the two plates of dielectric material with a proportional and inversely proportional to the distance between the two plates. However, the principle of super-capacitor is different.

Ultra capacitors in large capacitor, we have already mastered the electrolytic chemical (electrolytics) principle. Electrolytic capacitor is not super-chemical, but the understanding of electrolytic chemical help us understand this new super-capacitor technology.

It is called electrolysis chemistry, because it’s one (or two) “plate” is formed on the surface of metal non-metallic substrate electrolyte. In the manufacturing process, voltage, drive current from the anode metal flows through the cathode conductive bath. This will surface in the anode layer of insulating metal oxide – dielectric.

In the electrolytic chemistry, when the electrodes immersed in electrolyte solution, the boundary surface in the electrode charge accumulation and charge separation occurs in the phenomenon. Reverse-charged ions in the electrolyte in the electrode surface, accumulated the remaining compensation charge. The interface is called the Helmholtz layer (Helmholtz layer).

Super-capacitor structure is no longer the kind of dielectric material filling the middle of the plate electrode (or rolled into tubular plate electrode) structure – like the middle of the peanut butter sandwich. In the ultra-capacitor, charge the charge / discharge occurred in the electrolyte in the porous carbon materials or porous boundaries between the surface of metal oxide.

Known as the Helmholtz layer in a double layer capacitance effect. When a DC voltage is loaded into the ultra-capacitors at both ends of the porous carbon electrode for the charge compensation of the cations or anions in the charged electrode will occur around the accumulation of electrolyte. If the boundaries of the surface electron mobility does not appear, then “two” separation of charge (the metal side of the electron or electron hole, and the interface side of the border electrolyte cation or anion) will appear in the boundary surface (see Figure 1).

The new found about photovoltaic cells

Posted by admin on November 12, 2010
Netbook / Comments Off

Florida State University have developed a new solar cell can achieve a lower cost, more efficient light capture and collection of new programs.

Scientists have found that they can influence the energy in the “coded pulse in the excited state of the different information.” Researchers now have the ability to identify the optimal molecular structure for use in photovoltaic devices, to create a cheaper and more efficient solar cells.

New Florida State University (UF) revealed one of its new research: to make solar cells achieve lower cost, more efficient light capture and collection of new programs.

Energy path is achieved by the movement of molecules of molecular accumulation and transfer, for the new study’s press release, “ValeriaKleiman and three partners acquired the common path to real-time monitoring.”, They use “targeted phased laser pulse, “or” special spectrum at different speeds “by different energy sources. If Kleiman found that they can influence the energy in the “coded pulse in the excited state of the different information.”

Solar or solar photovoltaic researchers now have the ability to identify the optimal molecular structure for use in photovoltaic devices (storage and conversion of energy), to create a cheaper and more efficient solar cells.

ValeriaKleiman said the results “not only allow us to understand how the molecular reactions between, we can change the reaction pathway, so we can test different energy pathway to identify the most efficient path.”

Kleiman explains: “Suppose you want from here to Miami, and blocked the road ahead, we can tell you, ‘Do not choose this one, take another one now.’” It seems that this exciting new finding is that solar energy researchers and the public have hopes and expectations.